We even have an urgent delivery option for short essays, term papers, or research papers needed within 8 to 24 hours. We appreciate that you have chosen our cheap essay service, and will provide you with high-quality and low-cost custom essays, research papers, term papers, speeches, book reports, and other academic assignments for sale /03/05 · 47 Likes, 1 Comments - University of Central Arkansas (@ucabears) on Instagram: “Your gift provides UCA students with scholarships, programs, invaluable learning opportunities and ” This option has a fixed cost of $45, and variable-cost probabilities of.3 for $ each,.4 for $, and.3 for $ b) Subcontract: A medium-cost approach using a good outside design staff. This approach would have a fixed cost of $65, and variable-cost probabilities of.7 of $,.2 of $, and.1 of $
Assignment Essays - Best Custom Writing Services
periheli0n 36 days ago [—]. ziml77 36 days ago [—]. I doubt it. If you read the case they're making against Apple they actually do say why the iPhone and consoles are different. Their reasoning is that consoles are sold at a loss and the manufacturer needs to take those fees to support that sales model.
If Epic tried to take on Microsoft or Sony, their own assertion in the Apple case would be used against them. AlexandrB 36 days ago [—]. To me, this is a really weird argument. Why is Sony's business model Epic's problem? If Apple started selling phones at a loss would they now be in the clear in Epic's mind?
Is there a minimum "loss" required? Finally, what about Nintendo? They famously usually sell consoles at break-even or a small profit. Why isn't Epic suing them?
GuB 36 binary option signal reselling ago [—]. I think we just got the simple version and that in reality, there are hundreds of pages detailing as many points of contracts, agreements and precedents. But generally, publishing to consoles is a more involved process for both parties, and game consoles are not expected to be open platforms. So I guess the business model of console manufacturers is more tightly tied to publishing contracts. spijdar 36 days ago [—]. I think GP's point is, binary option signal reselling, why are game consoles not expected to be open platforms, but the iPhone is?
And who isn't to say Apple's business model isn't greatly tied to their closed platform? At least as far as public sentiment goes, binary option signal reselling, the only difference seems to just be precedent. existed in a strange grey area, binary option signal reselling. For whatever reason, people think they should have rights to their phone, binary option signal reselling, but not binary option signal reselling much for the game console.
Guessing it's because you can "just buy a PC" with greater performance and flexibility in essentially the same use domain as a console, but doesn't that apply to iPhones as well?
ksec 36 days ago [—], binary option signal reselling. Modern Society does not require a console to function. Most would agree our Smartphone has become the central to many things in our modern society including but not limited to business from all industries.
It has a substantial market that puts their Anti- Competitiveness in question. michaelbrave 36 days ago [—]. I think that as game consoles become binary option signal reselling multi purpose devices as Xbox has been championing for a while now that they will end up in a similar position as the app store.
ryandrake 36 days ago [—]. Binary option signal reselling they're just asking for iOS publishing to become more involved and complex, tied to contracts. I still don't see the difference between an iPhone and a Playstation.
They both have CPUs and RAM, they both have a locked down operating system neither are general purpose computersthey both run third party software vetted by the binary option signal reselling manufacturer, they both charge a percentage fee to publish on that platform.
dwild 36 days ago [—]. I know binary option signal reselling are weirdly trying to convince people it's not a computer using their ads, binary option signal reselling, but everyone laugh at theses ads too because that's absurd. It's definitely general binary option signal reselling. It's not a general purpose computer purely because the company decides what purposes are allowed and what purposes aren't, via store policy, binary option signal reselling.
Just like Sony decides what purposes are allowed and not allowed for the Playstation. Both products are computers, but it's hard to argue that they are "general purpose" computers. Contrast that with computers where there is no authority figure exercising editorial control.
Those are, by definition, general purpose. SmallDeadGuy 36 days ago [—]. By selling consoles at a loss, more people can afford to buy them bringing in a larger audience, binary option signal reselling. And even the people who could afford a more expensive console will simply have more money for games. gillesjacobs 36 days ago [—]. Audience capture is indeed the answer, and is probably why Epic doesn't mind. zwily 36 days ago [—].
But there are way more iPhones out binary option signal reselling than consoles, binary option signal reselling. argonaut 36 days ago [—]. Because the legal system is not some mechanistic program that computes decisions over cases. The legal system is for better or worse based on human judges that look at the entire context and make judgments of what is reasonable or not. Given that this is an antitrust case, the business model is absolutely part of the context.
Selling something at below cost to gain market share is a classic anti-competitive tactic. This aspect of Sony's business model vs. Apple's seems like it would be very unflattering for Sony if they had more market share. It's lucky that Sony still has strong competition in the form of Microsoft and Nintendo[1].
My personal take is that by saying "Sony is different though" Epic is trying to provide a fig leaf for a platform owner that could cause them real financial harm if they got on their bad side. Edit: [1] Isn't it interesting thought that the 3 console platforms don't compete on what percent cut they take from software published on their platforms.
masklinn 36 days ago [—]. cochne 36 days ago [—]. I think as soon as you start looking at this as a spectrum question and not a binary question, this argument falls apart. Therefore consoles should be allowed to charge but Apple should not.
pydry 36 days ago [—]. Extreme sustained profit margins are usually a signal that something fishy is going on.
AnIdiotOnTheNet 36 days ago [—]. A lot of brands have extreme profit margins on what they sell, but this is not considered illegal. Hell, a lot of brands are just reselling the same cheap goods as everyone else and charging more simply for having their name on it, but this is considered a perfectly valid business model. It's often unclear if consumers are fooled about the true quality of goods, whether they are Veblen goods.
If it's a Veblen good or if they genuinely do value the brand name alone then I guess it's fine but it's not too exactly ethical to fool consumers about the quality of your products or what the brand actually represents which is what consumers always say they value about brands - not the name itself.
I'm likewise not very sympathetic to the idea that these brands deserve government protection from knock offs. If consumers genuinely aren't bothered about whether their Nike shirt is "real" why does the government need to be? I think it is the Extreme "Net Profits Margin" that is fishy.
Extreme Gross profits margin is entirely what enables marketing and funding for luxury brands. binary option signal reselling 36 days ago [—]. Is producing WWDC an App Store cost? It's certainly accounted as a cost by Apple when it calculates its SllX 36 days ago [—]. Since when are the Courts in the business of determining which business models are valid and how much profit is justifiable? smiley 36 days ago [—]. Profit margin can be an indicator of monopolistic behavior, ie if you have a monopoly, you may be able to charge unusually high profit margins and maintain customers.
It's not absolute PROOF though, because maybe you can charge high profit margins because you make really good stuff and people and are willing to pay more. That is not an answer to my questions within the context of the comment I was replying to. That is in fact what happens. Apple rarely dominates in market share, and they do not have dominant phone market share.
DHPersonal 36 days ago [—]. I disagree, binary option signal reselling. kwanbix 36 days ago [—]. Apple makes lots of money on each iPhone sold. CharlesW 36 days ago [—]. Sincere question because I can't connect the dots: How is that relevant? toolz 36 days ago [—]. Personally I'd be fine with apple taking any percentage they want if they just opened their phone up to competing app stores. It really isn't. Apple could charge as much as they want as long as there are competition.
The problem then becomes if App Store is part of the total iPhone package, as lot of people and Apple are arguing that to be the case. Since the Apps are solely approved at Apple's discretion. And there are written evidence that Apple could hold or reject Apps that are in direct competition with them.
BINARY OPTIONS SIGNALS APP 99% Accurate FOR BINARY OPTIONS SIGNALS \u0026 FOREX SIGNALS - FREE 100%
, time: 5:14Fortnite’s cash cow is Playstation, not iOS, court documents reveal | Hacker News
/03/05 · 47 Likes, 1 Comments - University of Central Arkansas (@ucabears) on Instagram: “Your gift provides UCA students with scholarships, programs, invaluable learning opportunities and ” Chemical engineering design - GAVIN TOWLER, RAY blogger.com This option has a fixed cost of $45, and variable-cost probabilities of.3 for $ each,.4 for $, and.3 for $ b) Subcontract: A medium-cost approach using a good outside design staff. This approach would have a fixed cost of $65, and variable-cost probabilities of.7 of $,.2 of $, and.1 of $
No comments:
Post a Comment